Background: The impact of different sleeping categories on the risk of cancer of the breast has remained debatable. We sought to systematically synthesize the fund of available literature on this relationship from population-based cohort studies using meta-analytic procedures.
Data sources: Studies about napping and cancer of the breasts were identified from databases up to February 2019.
Methods: Identified studies were analyzed for quality using NOS Scores. Effect sizes were visualized using funnel plots. Study heterogeneity was quantified using I2 and visualized using Baujat plots. Publication prejudice was evaluated using Eggers regression model, with visualizations using funnel plots. Analysis were done using R.
Results: Eight cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Random effects model revealed non-statistically significant evidence of an association between short or long sleep and breast cancer OR=0.90;(95%CI 0.7995-1.0215); p=0.1054 and OR=0.95(0.8886-1.0280);p=0.2234 respectively. There was moderate to high heterogeneity I2(95%CI)=74.4%(48.2%-87.4%) among studies examining short sleep and cancer of the breast, and low to moderate heterogeneity in studies for long sleep and breast cancer I2(95%CI)=3.0%(0.0%-68.6%).
Conclusions: This study found non substantial evidence of associations between sleeping periods and cancer of the breast in women. Studies employing novel sleep measurement methodologies should be carried out to examine the underlying relationship.
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing through any medium of communication those illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere. Authors are also responsible for adding these permissions to the acknowledgement footnote that precedes all other notes or crediting the source and copyright of photographs or figures in the accompanying captions.
The journal's policy is to ask authors to grant us the licence to publish their work, which gives us the exclusive right both to reproduce and/or distribute their article (including the abstract) in printed, electronic or any other medium, and in turn to authorise others (including Reproduction Rights Organisations such as the Copyright Licensing Agency and the Copyright Clearance Center) to do the same. In return the author(s) assert their Moral Right to be identified as the author, and we promise that we will respect their rights as the author(s). That is, we will make sure that their name(s) is/are always clearly associated with the article and, while they do allow us to make necessary editorial changes, we will not make any substantial alteration to their article without consulting them.
Copyright remains with the author(s), however, the author(s) authorise us to act on their behalf to defend their copyright if anyone should infringe it, and to retain half of any damages awarded, after deducting our costs. The author(s) also retain the right to use their own article (provided they acknowledge the published original in standard bibliographic citation form) in the following ways, as long as they do not sell it or give it away in ways which would conflict directly with our interests. The author(s) is/are free to use their article for the internal educational or other purposes of their own institution or company; mounted on their own or their institution’s website; posted to free public servers of preprints and/or articles in their subject area; or in whole or in part, as the basis for their own further publications or spoken presentations.
If you have any queries about copyright please contact the Journal Coordinator, Fiona O'Brien, at F.O-Brien@warwick.ac.uk
Download data is not yet available.