The case of MINKA movement in Bolivia and its aim to re-politicize indigenous peoples
PDF

Keywords

Bolivia
indigeneity
MINKA
MAS government

Abstract

Since the dawn of the 21st century, indigenous identities and knowledge stand at the center of a scenario where new levers for social change are desperately sought for. In that scenario, indigenous knowledge and practices are taking on an increasingly important role in economic and social progress (Briggs ‎2005; Cleaver 1999). However, several authors argue that indigenous experiences and understandings have been idealized, leading to a process of de-politicization (Briggs ‎2005; Cleaver 1999; Zimmerer 2014). Their criticism is not based on the effectiveness of indigenous knowledge, but on its instrumentalization in order to support actions demanding social change (Cleaver 1999). These arguments made by Briggs, Cleaver and Zimmerer inevitably raise questions about the ways in which politics (and academia) produce knowledge about indigenous people and practices that reproduce de-contextualized representations.

PDF

References

Acosta, A. (2009). El Buen Vivir, una oportunidad por Construir. Ecuador Debate. No 75

(pp. 33-48)

Acosta, A., (2010). Sólo imaginando otros mundos, se cambiará éste. Reflexiones sobre el

Buen Vivir. Revista sustentabilidad(es).

Acosta, A. (2013). El Buen Vivir. Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar otros

mundos. Icaria, Barcelona, 2013, 190 pág

Benford, R. & Snow, D. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview

and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology (pp. 611-639).

Bengoa, J. (2000). La emergencia indígena en América Latina. Fondo de Cultura Económica

Beling, A.E (2014). Buen vivir: Emergent discourse within or beyond sustainable

development? Ecological Economics Vol. 707 (2074) (pp. 54–63)

Botero, P. (2012). Human Development & Polítical Violence y aportes al campo crítico de

las narrativas colectivas desde Colombia. Manizales: Revista Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y

Juventud. Universidad de Manizales-Cinde. Manizales, Colombia - Vol. 10 No.

1, Enero - Junio de 2012. Pp: 695-701

Burman, A. (2012). Places to think with, books to think about words, experience and the

decolonization of knowledge in the Bolivian Andes. University of California. Berkeley

Briggs, J. (2005) The use of indigenous knowledge in development: problems and challenges.

Department of Geography and Geomatics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ,

UK

Canel, E. (1997) New Social Movement Theory and Resources Mobilization Theory: The

Need for Integration. In Kaufman, M. & Alfonso, H. D. (Eds.) Community Power and

Grassroots Democracy: The Transformation of Social Life. London, Zed Books. IDRC.

Canessa, A. (2012). New Indigenous Citizenship in Bolivia: Challenging the Liberal Model

of the State and its Subjects. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 2012 -

Taylor & Francis

Casas-Cortés, M. I. (2008) Blurring Boundaries: Recognizing Knowledge-Practices in the

Study of Social Movements. Anthropology Quarterly, 81.

Cleaver, F. (1999). Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to

development. Journal of International Development. Volume 11, Issue 4, (pp. 597–612)

Ellen, R. & Harris, H. (2000). Introduction. In Ellen R, Parkes P and Bicker A (eds)

Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations (Harwood Academic

Publishers, Amsterdam), (pp. 1-33).

Escobar, A. (1992) Imagining a Post-Development Era? Critical thought, Development and

Social Movements. Social Text, 31/32 (pp. 20-56).

Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise. Cultural Studies, 21, (pp. 179- 210).

Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes, Durham, Duke

University Press.

Escobar, A. (2010). Latin America at a Crossroads: Alternative Modernizations,

Postliberalism, or Postdevelopment?

Escobar, A. (2014). Sentipensar con la tierra. Nuevas lecturas sobre desarrollo, territorio y

diferencia. Editorial: Unaula. Medellín. Colombia.

Fals Borda, Orlando Sociología de la liberación, Bogotá, Siglo xxi, 1968; Ciencia propia y

colonialismo intelectual, Bogotá, Carlos valencia Editores, 1981.

Foucault, M. & Chomsky, N. (1971) Debate: 'Human Nature: Justice Vs. Power'.

Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977,

New York, Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the college de France. English

Series Editor: Arnold 1. Davidson. Editorial Picador. New York

Freire, P. (1974) Education for Critical Consciousness, New York, Continuum

Freire, P. (2006) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York, The Continuum International

Publishing Group Inc.

Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. (2004). Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and

Emotion. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Grosfoguel, R. (2007) Descolonizando los universalismos occidentales: el pluriversalismo

transmoderno decolonial desde Aimé Césaire hasta los zapatistas. El giro decolonial:

reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global S. Castro-

Gómez y R. Grosfoguel. Ed. Siglo del Hombre-IESCO-Instotuto Pensar, Bogotá. (pp.

63-78).

Gudynas, E. (2009). La dimensión ecológica del buen vivir: entre el fantasma de la

modernidad y el desafío biocéntrico. OBETS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales 49-54

Gudynas, E. & Acosta, A. (2011). El buen vivir o la disolución de la idea del progreso. In:

Rojas, M. (Ed.), La Medición Del Progreso Y El Bienestar. Propuestas Desde América

Latina. Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico de México, México, (pp. 103-110).

Haraway, D. (1988) Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Femi-nism and the

Priviledge of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, (pp. 575-599).

Haraway, D. (1991). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the

Privilege of Partial Perspective.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of

Nature. New York: Routledge (pp. 183–201).

Haraway, D. (1997). Modest-Witness@Second-Millennium.Femaleman-Meets-

Oncomouse. New York: Routledge.

Hoetmer, R. (Ed.) (2007) Repensar la política desde América Latina. Cultura, Estado y

movimientos sociales. Lima, Fondo Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Unidad

de Posgrado. UNMSM.

Kalland, A. (2000). Indigenous knowledge: prospects and limitations. In Ellen R, Parkes P

and Bicker A (eds) Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations

(Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam), (pp. 1-33)

Kohl, Benjamin, and Rosalind Bresnahan (2010) Bolivia Under Morales: Consolidating

Power, Initiating Decolonization.” Latin American Perspectives. no. 5. (pp. 5-17).

Lander, E. (2010). Crisis civilizatoria: el tiempo se agota. In: León, I. (Ed.), Sumak Kawsay/

Buen Vivir Y Cambios Civilizatorios. Fedaeps, (pp. 27-40).

Parra, M. (2005) La Construcción de los Movimientos Sociales como Sujetos de Estudio en

América Latina. Athenea Digital, Num. 8, (pp. 72-94).

Quijano, A. (2011). ¿Bien vivir?: entre el "desarrollo" y la descolonialidad. Centro Andino de

Acción Popular (pp. 77-87)

Regalsky, P. (2008). Las paradojas del proceso constituyente boliviano. From:

www.constituyentesoberana.org

Reinaga, F. (1970). La revolución india. La Paz: Ediciones Fundación Amáutica

Rojas, C. (2009). The anti-systemic movements in Latin America and the struggle for land in

the XXI century. Revista Encrucijada Americana

Santos, B. (2001). Los nuevos movimientos sociales. Revista Osal.

Santos, B. (2005). The Future of the World Social Forum: The Work of Translation.

Development 48 (pp.15–22)

Santos, B. D. S. (2006) Conocer desde el Sur. Para una cultura política emancipato-ria, Lima,

Programa de Estudios sobre Democracia y Transformación Global.

Santos, B. D. S. (2009) Reinventando la Emancipación Social (Reinventing Social

Emancipation). Cuadernos de Pensamiento Critico Latinoamericano-CLACSO, No. 18.

Santos, B. D. S., Nunes, J. A. & Meneses, M. P. (2007) Opening Up the Canon of

Knowledge and the Recognition of Difference. Inc< Santos, B. D. S. (Ed.) Another

Knowledge is Possible London and New York, Verso.

Van der Velden, M. (2004). Cultivating knowledge diversity. Reflections on Cognitive

Justice, ICT and Development. Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and

Communication conference. Sweden

Yashar, D.J. (2005). Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous

Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge University Press.

Yung, I. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press

Zimmerer, K.S. (2015) Environmental governance through “Speaking like an indigenous

state” and respatializing resources: Ethical livelihood concepts in Bolivia as versatility or

verisimilitude? Geoforum 64 (pp. 314-324).

Zuazo, M. (2010). ¿Los movimientos sociales en el poder? El gobierno del MAS en Bolivia.

Revista Nueva Sociedad No 227

Zibechi, R. (2007) Autonomías y Emancipaciones: América Latina en Movimiento, Lima,

Fondo Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Unidad de Post Grado. UNMSM.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.