Age and Racial Disparities Persist for Gonorrhoea and
Chlamydia in the United States
Amy
Parnell, University of Warwick
Abstract
Sexually
Transmitted Infections (STIs) are primarily spread through sexual activity. In
recent years, STIs have been on the rise globally.
In the United States, chlamydia[2] and gonorrhoea[8] are the most prevalent bacterial
STIs and have been for the past decade. Both these infections infect the same
tissues, have similar modes of transmission[26], clinical presentations, and can be
treated by the same antibiotics. Yet, the epidemiologies and forecasts appear
to be different. This paper identifies vulnerable populations specific to
gonorrhoea and chlamydia and assesses factors that are likely driving these
disparities. Publicly available surveillance[23] data from The Centre for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) was examined to identify vulnerable populations
for both diseases. These findings show that there are sex-specific differences
in risk of gonorrhoea and chlamydia, and that young females carry an increased risk
of both. Also, there is an increased risk of both infections among the
Black/African American population. Understanding risk and risk-drivers is
essential to targeting these vulnerable populations for the interest of public
health.
Keywords: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs);
Sexual health; Gonorrhoea; Chlamydia; Risk factors; Adolescent sexual health; Ethnic
disparities; Social determinants of health; prevalence.
Introduction
Epidemiology[6]
The United States is experiencing a
rise in sexually transmitted infections[22]
(STIs), reaching an epidemic status, and posing a significant public health
threat (Nelson et
al., 2021). For the
past decade, chlamydia
and gonorrhoea have remained the most prevalent
STIs in the United States, with 1,649,716 and 648,056 cases reported in 2022,
respectively (Nelson et
al., 2021).

Figure
1A - Rates of
infection are dependent on historical events.
Figure 1: Rates
of gonorrhoea and chlamydia, in the United States 1941–2022. A. Incidence. White, gonorrhoea; grey, chlamydia.
White, arrowhead, introduction of penicillin (Hook and Kirkcaldy, 2018); grey
arrowhead, start of the free love and the hippie movement (Goldman, 1998;
Johnson Lewis, 2019); black arrowhead, impact of condoms during HIV[9]/AIDS epidemic (Kershaw, 2018; Boti
Sidamo et al., 2021). Blue dashed line, threshold
resistant to public health interventions. B. Future projections. Dotted lines, exponential
extrapolations. Data from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/datavis/table-sticasesrates.html.
In
recent years, rates of reported chlamydia and gonorrhoea in the United States
have risen (CDC, 2024a). In 2022, the rates of reported cases of chlamydia were
more than double that of gonorrhoea (Figure 1B) (CDC, 2024a). Curiously, they
infect the same tissues, have similar modes of transmission, clinical presentations and can be
treated by the same antibiotics (CDC 2021a; CDC, 2021b; CDC, 2024a; Quillin and
Seifert, 2018). Yet, the epidemiologies
and forecasts appear to be different. Considering the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic[13] on reporting, estimates were
measured prior to the pandemic; these forecasts presented chlamydia doubling
every 18 years and gonorrhoea doubling every 7 years (Figure 1B) (Sentís et
al., 2021). This
strongly suggests that transmission of these infections is driven by different
populations. The aim of this project was to identify the risk groups and to
explore key determinants that are driving these differences, such as
biological, behavioural, cultural and social factors.
Transmission
Transmission of gonorrhoea is highly
efficient from males to their sexual partners through ejaculates as N. gonorrhoeae attaches to sperm (James-Holmquest et al., 1974). However, the efficiency of
transmission from females to their partners remains unclear (Ketterer et al., 2016). Chlamydia transmission can
occur during contact with infected genitalia, regardless of ejaculation (NHS,
2017).
Clinical manifestations and sequala
Clinical manifestations of
gonorrhoea and chlamydia are similar but often go unnoticed (Quillin and
Seifert, 2018). Typically, symptoms[24]
are more apparent in males, such as dysuria[4]
and a purulent discharge[16] from the penis, whereas females are more likely to
experience inconspicuous symptoms, such as vaginal discharge, which can be
mistaken for hormonal fluctuations and typical variability (Quillin and
Seifert, 2018).
Timely treatment is important to
reduce the severity of sequela and prevent further transmission (NHS, 2017).
Importantly, if left untreated, chlamydia and gonorrhoea can result in PID, ectopic pregnancies[5] and irreversible infertility in
females and urethritis[27],
epididymitis[7] and proctocolitis[15] in males (Jennings and Krywko, 2023;
Stamm et al., 1984).
Thus far, there are no studies that
include recent data released by the CDC that explore the US population. To
improve sexual health, we must understand both distinct and common influences
on risk and identify populations that are disproportionately at risk of these
infections so we can consider public health interventions to target the
populations that are disproportionately affected.
Materials and methods
Source of data
Datasets were from the Sexually
Transmitted Infections Surveillance Report, published by The Centre for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/data-vis/index.html.
ꭓ2 tests
The CDC surveillance data includes unrecorded sex, similarly
unknown age and ethnicity. Since this data is uninterpretable, it was redacted
for analysis. Multiracial data is counterintuitive due to the absence of
details within this population, making it challenging to explore the social
determinants affecting risk in this population.
Expected values considered the null
hypothesis; there is no proportionate difference in sex of the population and
observed number of STI diagnoses and these values were calculated from the
proportion of the population (using US census data) (Duffin, 2022; BMJ, 2019).
When observed frequencies were compared with expected frequencies of a single
variable – for example, sex – a ꭓ2 Goodness of Fit test was
used. An example calculation from 2017 is shown in Table 1. The gender ratio in
the United States has remained steady since 2013 so the same ratio was used for
analyses (Duffin, 2022).
When examining the relationship
between two independent variables, such as sex and age, comparisons were made
using a ꭓ2 contingency test (BMJ, 2019). Expected values were
derived from ꭓ2 contingency considerations and calculated
using the proportion of ethnicity (using US census data) and observed cases
(BMJ, 2019). Risk groups, those with proportionately more or fewer cases than
expected, were identified by the largest contribution to the ꭓ2
value (‘splitting’ of ꭓ2) (BMJ, 2019). Methods are described
in full in BMJ Statistics at square one (BMJ, 2019). A worked example
calculation from 2017 is shown in Table 2. Calculation outputs are shown in
Table 3.
sex
|
o
a
|
e
b
|
o-e
|
(o-e)2
|
(o-e)2/e
|
|
Male
|
321,963
|
274328.995
|
47,634
|
2268998413
|
8271.085
|
|
Female
|
232,461
|
280095.005
|
-47,634
|
2268998413
|
8100.817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16371.9
|
χ2
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
df
c
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
P
d
|
a observed cases; b
expected cases (proportions from US census in 2010); c degrees of
freedom; d probability value.
Table
1: Testing
incidence of gonorrhoea in 2017.
|
|
o a
|
o
|
e b
|
e
|
Age
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
0–4
|
|
56
|
144
|
116.1432
|
83.85676
|
5–9
|
|
19
|
90
|
63.29807
|
45.70193
|
10–14
|
|
507
|
2,212
|
1578.967
|
1140.033
|
15–19
|
|
34918
|
57573
|
53711.02
|
38779.98
|
20–24
|
|
81036
|
74578
|
90367.57
|
65246.43
|
24–29
|
|
75123
|
46577
|
70673.16
|
51026.84
|
30–34
|
|
47342
|
24157
|
41520.63
|
29978.37
|
35–39
|
|
30277
|
13448
|
25391.82
|
18333.18
|
40–44
|
|
17753
|
6331
|
13985.97
|
10098.03
|
45–54
|
|
23803
|
5580
|
17063.18
|
12319.82
|
55–64
|
|
9311
|
1538
|
6300.19
|
4548.81
|
65+
|
|
1818
|
233
|
1191.049
|
859.9511
|
Total
|
|
321963
|
232461
|
321,963
|
232,461
|
o-e
|
o-e
|
(o-e)2
|
|
(o-e)2
|
(o-e)2/e
|
|
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Male
|
|
Female
|
Male
|
Female
|
SUM
|
|
-60.14324
|
60.14324
|
3617.209384
|
|
3617.209384
|
31.1
|
43.1
|
74.3
|
|
-44.29807
|
44.29807
|
1962.31866
|
|
1962.31866
|
31.0
|
42.9
|
73.9
|
|
-1071.967
|
1071.967
|
1149114.011
|
|
1149114.011
|
727.8
|
1008.0
|
1735.7
|
|
-18793.02
|
18793.02
|
353177687.5
|
|
353177687.5
|
6575.5
|
9107.2
|
15682.7
|
|
-9331.571
|
9331.571
|
87078220.62
|
|
87078220.62
|
963.6
|
1334.6
|
2298.2
|
|
4449.838
|
-4449.84
|
19801059.33
|
|
19801059.33
|
280.2
|
388.1
|
668.2
|
|
5821.372
|
-5821.37
|
33888374.51
|
|
33888374.51
|
816.2
|
1130.4
|
1946.6
|
|
4885.184
|
-4885.18
|
23865023.05
|
|
23865023.05
|
939.9
|
1301.7
|
2241.6
|
|
3767.031
|
-3767.03
|
14190522.35
|
|
14190522.35
|
1014.6
|
1405.3
|
2419.9
|
|
6739.816
|
-6739.82
|
45425117.21
|
|
45425117.21
|
2662.2
|
3687.2
|
6349.3
|
|
3010.81
|
-3010.81
|
9064976.352
|
|
9064976.352
|
1438.8
|
1992.8
|
3431.7
|
|
626.9511
|
-626.951
|
393067.6418
|
|
393067.6418
|
330.0
|
457.1
|
787.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37709
|
χ2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
df c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
P d
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a observed cases; b
expected cases (proportions from US census in 2010); c degrees of
freedom; d probability value.
Table 2: Testing incidence of gonorrhoea in
2017.
|
Sex-specific differences
|
|
|
|
Gonorrhoea
|
Chlamydia
|
|
|
Year
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
Year
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
2017
|
16371.9
|
554424
|
1
|
0
|
2017
|
166137.9
|
1703956
|
1
|
0
|
2018
|
19435.8
|
582167
|
1
|
0
|
2018
|
151787
|
1753474
|
1
|
0
|
2019
|
21333.9
|
614640
|
1
|
0
|
2019
|
136797.7
|
1800973
|
1
|
0
|
2020
|
15325.1
|
675432
|
1
|
0
|
2020
|
135244.4
|
1571770
|
1
|
0
|
2021
|
20208.4
|
702756
|
1
|
0
|
2021
|
121960.3
|
1630268
|
1
|
0
|
2022
|
31072.4
|
645594
|
1
|
0
|
2022
|
109668.3
|
1641143
|
1
|
0
|
|
Age-specific differences
|
|
|
|
Gonorrhoea
|
Chlamydia
|
|
|
Year
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
Year
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
2017
|
377709
|
554424
|
11
|
0
|
2017
|
74720
|
1703956
|
11
|
0
|
2018
|
38679
|
582167
|
11
|
0
|
2018
|
82023
|
1753474
|
11
|
0
|
2019
|
40388
|
614640
|
11
|
0
|
2019
|
85645
|
1800973
|
11
|
0
|
2020
|
38568
|
675432
|
11
|
0
|
2020
|
71411
|
1571770
|
11
|
0
|
2021
|
39799
|
704756
|
11
|
0
|
2021
|
77656
|
1630268
|
11
|
0
|
2022
|
38836
|
645594
|
11
|
0
|
2022
|
77837
|
1641143
|
11
|
0
|
|
Ethnicity-specific differences in 2022
|
|
|
|
Gonorrhoea
|
Chlamydia
|
|
|
Sex
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
Sex
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
Males
|
456346.9
|
303,311
|
6
|
0
|
Males
|
405099.8
|
410560
|
6
|
0
|
Females
|
224406.9
|
201122
|
6
|
0
|
Females
|
658988.3
|
719612
|
6
|
0
|
|
Sex-specific differences between ethnicities in 2022
|
|
|
|
Gonorrhoea
|
Chlamydia
|
|
|
Ethnicity
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
Ethnicity
|
ꭓ2
|
N
a
|
df
c
|
P
d
|
B/AA
|
15705
|
245961
|
11
|
0
|
B/AA
|
18110
|
467246
|
11
|
0
|
White
|
12020
|
142546
|
11
|
0
|
White
|
31147
|
359737
|
11
|
0
|
Hisp/Lat
|
6309
|
83524
|
11
|
0
|
Hisp/Lat
|
13791
|
233536
|
11
|
0
|
Asian
|
702
|
8053
|
11
|
0
|
Asian
|
2024
|
20348
|
11
|
0
|
Multiracial
|
1629
|
14142
|
11
|
0
|
Multiracial
|
2877
|
28391
|
11
|
0
|
AI/AN
|
166
|
9039
|
11
|
0
|
AI/AN
|
276
|
17319
|
11
|
0
|
NH/PI
|
73
|
1177
|
11
|
0
|
NH/PI
|
170
|
3595
|
11
|
0
|
a observed cases; c degrees
of freedom; d probability value.
Table
3: Chi-squared test
calculation outputs.
Results
Males
carry the burden of gonorrhoea; females, chlamydia
As a first step towards identifying
high- and low-risk groups, diagnosed cases were separated by sex, and these
observed numbers were compared with χ2 expectations based upon
the proportion of males and females in US census records (see Table 1) (Duffin,
2022; U.S. Census Bureau, 2021). Over the past six years where data is
available, males have consistently carried a greater burden of diagnosed
gonorrhoea than females, with rates ranging from 28 per cent to 42 per cent
higher and an average difference of 34 per cent (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Males
carry a larger burden of diagnosed gonorrhoea (2017–2022). Columns, diagnoses; red crosses, expected values
derived from the proportion of males and females in the US population (Duffin,
2022). Significance was determined by χ2 goodness of fit tests:
an example calculation from 2017 is shown in Table 1. Data from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/15.htm.
In marked contrast, females have
carried a consistently higher burden of diagnosed chlamydia than males over the
same period, averaging 59 per cent higher with rates ranging from 54 per cent
to 64 per cent (Figure 3). Thus, despite having the same transmission route and
infecting the same tissues, there are sex-specific differences for the two
infections. Of note, these are diagnosed cases, which may not reflect the true
burden of disease due to factors such as avoidance of, or limited access to,
regular sexual health screening[17].

Figure 3: Females
carry a larger burden of diagnosed chlamydia (2017–2022). Columns, diagnoses; red crosses,
expected values derived from χ2 considerations. Data from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/6.htm.
Young females are high risk of gonorrhoea; males are low
risk of chlamydia
Having
established the influence of sex on the burden of infection, the data was
divided into age and sex, examining by χ2 contingency tests
(see Table 2). Despite there being an average of 34 per cent greater burden of gonorrhoea
in males, young females (age 15–24) carry a high proportional risk and have
done for the last six years (Figure 4). Notably, older males (age 45–54) also
carry a high proportional risk, suggesting transmission from older males to
young females.

Figure 4: Young
females carry a larger proportional burden of diagnosed gonorrhoea (2017–2022). Columns, diagnoses; orange, high-risk female groups;
red crosses, expected values derived from χ2 contingency
considerations: an example calculation from 2017 is shown in Table 2. Data from
CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/15.htm.
Conversely,
even though females carried an average of 59 per cent greater burden of
diagnosed chlamydia, young males (age 15–24) have the lowest proportional risk
of chlamydia and have done for the last six years (Figure 5), indicating that
the burden of infection is age dependent.

Figure 5: Young
males carry the lowest proportional burden of diagnosed chlamydia (2017–2022). Columns, diagnoses; green, low-risk male groups; red
crosses, expected values derived from χ2 contingency
considerations. Data from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/6.htm.
Black/African
American population are high risk of gonorrhoea and chlamydia; White population
is low risk
Having identified the impact of age
and sex, the impact of ethnicity on risk was investigated by χ2
goodness of fit. The Black/African American population were revealed to have a
proportionately high risk of gonorrhoea, and the White population are
proportionately low risk (Figure 6). Specifically, Black/African American males
are ten times more likely to be diagnosed with gonorrhoea than White males,
while Black/African American females are almost nine times more likely than White
females.
Females were also identified as
lower relative risk of gonorrhoea compared to their male counterparts, except
in the American Indian/Alaska Native population. Despite the burden of
diagnosis being higher among the Black/African American population, there is a
notable shift in the Hispanic/Latino population, where Hispanic/Latino males
are at a proportionately higher risk of infection and females at a
proportionately low risk. The Asian population have the lowest relative risk.
American Indian/Alaska Native have a relatively high risk of infection.

Figure 6: The
US Black/African American population carries a disproportionate burden of
gonorrhoeal cases in 2022.
Columns, diagnoses;
orange, highest risk group; green, lowest risk group; crosses, expectation.
Inset, RR, relative risk (observed/expected). B/AA, Black/African American;
Hispanic, Hispanic/Latino; AI/AN, American Indian/Alaskan Native; NH/PI, Native
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Data from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/16.htm.
Like gonorrhoea infection,
Black/African American population carry the highest proportional risk of
chlamydia cases (Figure 7). Black/African American males are more than eight
times as likely to be diagnosed with chlamydia, and females are over six times
as likely, compared to their White counterparts. However, White males have the
highest proportional contribution to χ2, carrying the lowest
proportional risk. Remarkably, Hispanic/Latino females have a high proportional
risk, and males have a low proportional risk, despite the inverse being
observed for gonorrhoea. A similar trend was observed in the Native
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander population. Like gonorrhoeal infection, the Asian
population are associated with low risk whereas American Indian/Alaska Native
are associated with high risk.
While
these results indicate that ethnicity influences the risk of these infections,
social and cultural factors also play a role in these disparities.

Figure 7: The
US Black/African American population carries a disproportionate burden of
chlamydia cases in 2022.
Columns, diagnoses;
orange, highest risk group; green, lowest risk group; crosses, expectation.
Inset, RR, relative risk (observed/expected). B/AA, Black/African American;
Hispanic, Hispanic/Latino; AI/AN, American Indian/Alaskan Native; NH/PI, Native
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Data from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/7.htm.
Young females are high risk of gonorrhoea; young males are
low risk of chlamydia
Next,
the risks associated with age within ethnic groups was examined by χ2
contingency tests. Overall, risk groups were similar across ethnicities, with
adolescent and young adult females (age 15–24) having the highest proportional
risk of gonorrhoea (Figure 8). Interestingly, American Indian/Alaskan Native
individuals formed a distinct risk group, with young adult males (aged 15–19)
exhibiting a high proportional risk. This was attributed to underreporting,
which may mask the true number of cases in this population. Nevertheless, the
uniform risk across the three largest populations suggests factors, other than
cultural, are driving infection.

Figure 8: Independent
of ethnicity, young females carry a disproportionately high burden of
gonorrhoeal cases in 2022.
Columns, diagnoses; orange, highest risk group; green, lowest risk male groups;
red crosses, expected values derived from χ2 contingency
considerations. B/AA, Black/African American; Hispanic, Hispanic/Latino; AI/AN,
American Indian/Alaskan Native; NH/PI, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Data
from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/16.htm.
Similarly,
risk groups for chlamydia are consistent across ethnicities. Notably, young
males (age 15–24) have the lowest proportional risk of chlamydia (Figure 9).
Distinct risk groups were identified in Multiracial and Native Hawaiian/Pacific
Islander ethnicities, although this is likely justified by the relatively small
population size.

Figure 9: Independent
of ethnicity, young males carry a disproportionately low burden of chlamydia
cases in 2022. Columns, diagnoses; orange, highest risk
group; green, lowest risk male groups; red crosses, expected values derived
from χ2 contingency considerations. B/AA, Black/African
American; Hispanic, Hispanic/Latino; AI/AN, American Indian/Alaskan Native;
NH/PI, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Data from CDC, https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/tables/7.htm.
Discussion
Sex-specific risk
Given that STIs are on the rise in
the United States, I sought to identify risk groups and explore potential
drivers of infection for gonorrhoea and chlamydia (Nelson et al., 2021). When comparing observed cases
with ꭓ2 expectations, I noticed that there are different
burdens of diagnosis between sexes and have been since 2017. Males carry the
burden of gonorrhoea diagnosis and females carry the burden of chlamydia
diagnosis.
Female biological vulnerability
It is recognised that females are
biologically more susceptible to STIs due to the vulnerability of the vaginal
membrane (Van Gerwen et
al., 2022). The
vaginal mucosa is thin and easily penetrated by an array of pathogens,
including N. gonorrhoeae
and C. trachomatis
(Van Gerwen et al., 2022). In tandem, there is an
increased efficiency of transmission from males to females, compared to females
to males (Hooper et
al., 1978; Platt et al., 1983). Recent studies indicate that
following a single sexual encounter[18]
exposing an individual to gonorrhoea, a female is 60–90 per cent likely to
become infected whereas a male is only 20–30 per cent likely, due to a greater
exposure in females due to pooled semen in the vagina in conjunction with
trauma to vaginal tissue during intercourse (Platt et al., 1983; Hooper et al., 1978). In addition, females are more
likely to carry less decision-making power over sexual relationships, which is
associated with the ability to ensure consistent condom use (Ford and Lepkowski, 2004; Tschann et
al., 2002).
Therefore, females are more biologically susceptible and have less empowerment
over protecting themselves, which may partly explain the increased risk
observed in females for chlamydia.
Sex-specific health-seeking behaviours
Biological
susceptibility does not explain the difference observed in gonorrhoea, where
males carry the burden of diagnosis. Instead, the cryptic nature of these
infections may explain this disparity (Quillin and Seifert, 2018). Both
infections often go unnoticed, but chlamydia infection appears to be more
inconspicuous. Chlamydia infection is asymptomatic[1]
in up to 70 per cent of females and 50 per cent of males while gonorrhoea is estimated
to be 10 per cent of males and 50 per cent of females (NHS, 2019). This
suggests that asymptomatic screening likely plays a substantial role in
reported chlamydia (CDC, 2024b). In contrast, symptomatic[25] testing, more common in males, is
responsible for the majority of reported gonorrhoea cases. This concept was
supported by a study associating sex with different health-seeking behaviours;
specifically, young females are more engaged in health services, such as
regular Pap testing, which link them to sexual health services (Knight et al., 2016). Hence, females are more likely
to go for asymptomatic testing.
In marked contrast, young males
practice self-monitoring of symptoms and tend to avoid formal diagnosis (Knight
et al., 2016). When young males did access
sexual health services, they did so reactively: after engaging in a high-risk
sexual encounter or when experiencing symptoms (Knight et al., 2016). Taken together, the sex
differences in cases of gonorrhoea and chlamydia can be explained by diverging
health-seeking behaviours, such that females tend to be proactive so are more
likely to detect asymptomatic infections, which are most common in chlamydia,
while males tend to be reactive, seeking testing when they experience symptoms,
which are more common in gonorrhoea (Knight et al.,
2016).
Sexual risk among adolescents
Risk is also age dependent. I
revealed that while males have an elevated overall risk of gonorrhoea, young
females (aged 15–24) have a high proportional risk of infection. Biological
susceptibility is partially responsible for the elevated risk in pubescent
females due to increased cervical ectopy and a lower production of cervical
mucus (Lee et al., 2006; Shannon and Klausner, 2019).
Studies have shown the cervical ectopy is linked with increased risk of
gonorrhoea and chlamydia infection (Kleppa et al.,
2014). Young females also tend to have a lower production of cervical mucus,
which plays a protective role against infection (Wong et al., 2004). Thus, if exposed to an STI,
young females are more likely to get infected, which would explain the
disparity in risk of gonorrhoea (Kleppa et al., 2014;
Lee et al., 2006; Shannon and Klausner, 2019; Wong
et al., 2004).
Additionally, behavioural factors,
as highlighted in a pilot study, influence risk of STIs (Tzilos et al., 2020). Namely, alcohol consumption
while at college was closely linked to engaging in condomless sex (Tzilos et al., 2020). Another study highlighted
that young people are more likely to reduce or drop using condoms when in monogamous[10] relationships, potentially exposing
them to STIs (Brady et
al., 2009).
Risk paradox
Notably, this difference was not
seen in young males (age 15–24), identified as proportionately low risk of
gonorrhoea and chlamydia. However, these results seem paradoxical. In fact,
according to current literature, all adolescents are at an increased risk of
STIs (Maraynes et
al., 2017; The
Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2022). I reasoned that reduced screening
is masking true cases in the young male population (Maraynes et al., 2017).
In terms of behaviour, adolescents
are typically more likely to engage in sexual activity associated with
increased risk of STIs, such as concurrent partners, polygamous[14] relationships
and condomless sex, due to a developing prefrontal cortex (Shannon and
Klausner, 2019). The prefrontal context is responsible for executive function, so
an undeveloped may somewhat explains poor decision-making typically seen in
this age group (Shannon and Klausner, 2019). Furthermore, adolescents perceive
themselves as low-risk and are less likely to access sexual health services (Shannon
and Klausner, 2019; Tzilos et al., 2020). To address this, an increase in sexual
health education prior to sexual debut and continued awareness and access to
screening services would be essential to target adolescents. In addition,
further efforts are necessary in screening symptomatic young males for a
comprehensive understanding of risk in this group.
Sexual risk among different ethnicities
Since my results are driven by Chi-squared
expectation, risk groups are revealed if they deviate from the major population
– in this case, White (U.S. Census Bureau, 2021). When comparing ethnicities,
it is clear there are considerable differences in relative risk of gonorrhoea
and chlamydia. Black/African Americans are at elevated risk and Whites are
proportionately low risk. I first explored the possibility of behavioural
differences driving these diverging risks. A study discovered that Whites and
Hispanics are more likely to engage in oral sex[12]
when compared to Black/African Americans (Auslander et al., 2009). The study also revealed that
among this cohort, females who had experience of vaginal and oral sex were six
times more likely to have a history of STIs, compared to those who had
experience of vaginal sex only (Auslander et al.,
2009). Another study supported these findings (Salazar et al., 2008). Therefore, despite
Black/African American being more likely to participate in behaviour associated
with low risk, they remain at increased risk. Alternatively, White females are
more likely to engage in risk-associated behaviours yet remain low risk. This
provides compelling evidence that risk is not determined solely by sexual
practices (Auslander et
al., 2009; Salazar et al., 2008).
The relative risk among the Asian
population was lower than any other ethnic group. This is consistent with
research that suggests that Asians are more conservative in sexual behaviours
(Okazaki, 2002). Specifically, a cross-sectional questionnaire study revealed
that Asian students reported sexual initiation at a later age compared to
non-Asian students, a lower likelihood of having participated in oral sex and a
lower number of lifetime sexual partners (Meston et al., 1996). Culturally, Asians value
family and maintain traditional gender roles; hence, young people tend to
abstain from sexual activity to avoid embarrassment and family disagreement
(Okazaki, 2002). Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders share these family values
and display a similarly low risk (Okazaki, 2002). Therefore, the observed risk
is reflective of low-risk behaviours (Okazaki, 2002).
Of note, the Hispanic/Latino
population displayed unique risk characteristics and sex was identified as a
key determinant of risk. Hispanic/Latino males are low risk of chlamydia and
Hispanic/Latino females are high risk. This is likely attributed to biological
susceptibility and health-seeking behaviours previously discussed (Ford and
Lepkowski, 2004; Hooper et
al., 1978; Knight et al., 2016; Platt et al., 1983; Tschann et al., 2002).
Curiously, the risk of chlamydia is
shifted as Hispanic/Latino males are high risk of gonorrhoea whereas
Hispanic/Latino females are low risk. This strongly suggests that gonorrhoea
and chlamydia infection are driven by different populations.
Social risk factors
Next, I explored social factors that
influence risk of gonorrhoea and chlamydia. In Black/African American
communities, there is a smaller number of males compared to females (Adimora
and Schoenbach, 2005). This restricts the variation in sexual partners and
larger overlaps in sexual networks[19],
which would facilitate the rapid transmission of STIs (Adimora and Schoenbach,
2005). There is also an increased prevalence of gonorrhoea and chlamydia in the
population so, following each sexual encounter, there is a higher risk of
infection (Adimora and Schoenbach, 2005). The CDC suggests that historical
injustices in healthcare, employment and education is likely the driver of
existing sexual health inequities (CDC, 2024b; Sutton et al., 2021).
Furthermore, there is an
overrepresentation of Black/African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos living in
poverty in the United States (Shrider, 2023). Unsurprisingly, low socioeconomic
status is associated with high risk of STIs (Boskey, 2009). It has also been
linked with inconsistent condom use (Davidoff-Gore et al., 2011). Exposure to poverty
predisposes individuals to substance abuse, which increases risk of STIs (Hwang
et al., 2000; Manhica et al., 2020). This suggests that
socioeconomic factors have influenced the racial disparities in cases of
gonorrhoea and chlamydia, particularly evident in the Black/African American
and Hispanic/Latino populations (Hwang et
al., 2000; Manhica et al., 2020). Nonetheless, these
observations largely remained evident after adjusting for socioeconomic and
other demographic variables (Zenilman, 2001). A similar discrepancy was
identified in the UK where there is universal access to free healthcare (Zenilman,
2001). Hence, the disparity cannot be caused solely by a lack of access to
sexual health services, but a reflection of health-seeking behaviours. I
reasoned that injustices may deter ethnic minorities from accessing healthcare
because of the anticipated discrimination from healthcare providers (Medical
Institute for Sexual Health, 2024).
Similarly, historical mistreatment
among Indigenous populations, as seen in the American Indian/Alaska Native
population, has caused disproportionately high rates of poverty and limited
access to sexual health services (Kirkcaldy et al., 2019).
Limited access to healthcare services results in reduced condom use and reduced
screening, all contributing to an increase in transmission (Sutton et al., 2021). Social isolation can amplify
this effect due to a high prevalence of gonorrhoea and chlamydia in the sexual
network, reinforcing transmission (CDC, 2024b).
Young
females are high risk of gonorrhoea regardless of ethnicity
Aside from the American
Indian/Alaska Native population, risk groups are consistent across all
ethnicities, with young females carrying a higher burden of diagnosis of
gonorrhoea. I reasoned that biological susceptibility is largely responsible
due to a uniform risk among young females, including populations that are
associated with low-risk behaviours (Okazaki, 2002).
Adultification of young Black
females
Georgetown Law Centre on Poverty and
Inequality found that young Black females are viewed as more mature than their White
peers (Epstein et
al., 2017).
Crucially, the concept of adultification can influence behaviours towards young
Black females, exposing them to adult knowledge and conferring adult
responsibilities (Burton, 2007). These misperceptions can leave young Black
females vulnerable to sexual abuse and subsequent STIs (Crooks et al., 2019). Therefore, the elevated risk
of gonorrhoea and chlamydia observed in young Black females may be in part a
consequence of their adultification (Burton, 2007; Crooks et al., 2019; Epstein et al., 2017).
Barriers facing American
Indian/Alaska Native
Among American Indian/Alaska Native
there is little enhanced risk in young females; instead, young males carry a
proportionately low risk of gonorrhoea. The literature suggests that high
levels of underreporting in this population is masking true cases (Armenta et al., 2021). The literature suggests that
risk is high due to engagement in risk-associated behaviours, poor awareness of
STIs and prevention methods, and self-perception of low risk (Armenta et al., 2021). Barriers to accessing sexual
health services include a lack of transportation in rural communities, stigma[21]
and a fear of disclosure (Armenta et
al., 2021).
Therefore, the observed risk among young American Indian/Alaska Native males is
likely a result of underreporting (Armenta et al.,
2021).
Young males are low risk of chlamydia regardless of
ethnicity
Corresponding with earlier results,
young males have a uniform low risk of chlamydia. However, this may be due to
underreporting as previously discussed, an alternative reason is indeed young
males may not be as sexually active as they claim. Early studies found that
there was evidence of a double standard, causing young males to overreport their
sexual encounters and females to underreport (Eden and Others, 1995; Oliver and
Sedikides, 1992; Sprecher et
al., 1987); although
there are no recent studies confirming this notion is still present (Gentry,
1998; Marks and Fraley, 2005; Milhausen and Herold, 1999). I speculate that the
low risk of gonorrhoea and chlamydia seen in young males may be representative
of true cases. Still, this would require further investigation.
Limitations
First, my findings are based on
surveillance data of confirmed cases. Therefore, it is possible that there are
individuals not captured due to being unaware of their infection. Second,
although the data shows that the Black/African American population carry a
disproportionately high risk of gonorrhoea and chlamydia, the CDC generalise
ethnicities, such that Black/African American includes both Black African
American and Black Caribbean. In fact, surveillance data in the UK has revealed
Black Caribbean having the highest burden of diagnosis, in marked contrast to
Black Africans who carry a relatively low risk of STIs (Public Health England,
2021). Thus, surveillance distinguishing between ethnic groups is warranted.
Similarly, the CDC does not report data on sexual orientation[20] in the context of gonorrhoea or
chlamydia, except by state. This would be beneficial as sexual orientation can
assist in determining risk. Third, there is the risk of misclassification,
particularly among American Indian/Alaska Native, who are commonly
misidentified as White or Hispanic/Latino, potentially limiting reliability
(Bertolli et al., 2007).
Conclusions
Despite these limitations, these
findings highlight several important directions in this research field. (1)
Gonorrhoea and chlamydia are influenced by sex differences due to biological
susceptibility, varying health-seeking behaviours and transmission patterns in
same-sex encounters. (2) Young females carry a disproportionately high risk of
gonorrhoea and chlamydia due to increased biological susceptibility and
risk-associated behaviour. (3) Ethnic disparities are apparent, emanating from
social inequalities and pre-existing risk.
Overall,
my research aligns with previous literature, confirming that age and racial
disparities persist, with adolescents and ethnic minorities being at increased
risk of chlamydia and gonorrhoea. These findings are unique as they take a
holistic approach to analysing population-based data, rather than focusing
exclusively on historically high-risk groups such as transgender individuals
and sex workers. While these groups carry a significant infection burden, they
constitute a relatively small proportion of the population. My research also
contextualises the drivers of infection, exploring how sex, age and ethnicity
influence risk. These insights can inform evidence-based public health
interventions which target the most vulnerable populations. Consequently, this
research provides a distinctive perspective on current vulnerability, aiding
efforts to reduce the prevalence of these highly common sexually transmitted
infections in the United States.
Acknowledgements
The
author of this article is Amy Parnell, the University of Warwick. I would like
to extend my deep thanks to Dr Robert Spooner who offered his expertise and
support.
List of tables
Table 1:
Testing incidence of gonorrhoea in 2017.
Table 2:
Testing incidence of gonorrhoea in 2017.
Table 3: Chi-squared
test calculation outputs.
List of illustrations
Figure
1: Rates of
gonorrhoea and chlamydia, USA 1941–2022.
Figure
2: Males carry a
larger burden of diagnosed gonorrhoea (2017–2022).
Figure
3: Females carry a
larger burden of diagnosed chlamydia (2017–2022).
Figure
4: Young females
carry a larger proportional burden of diagnosed gonorrhoea (2017–2022).
Figure
5: Young males
carry the lowest proportional burden of diagnosed chlamydia (2017–2022).
Figure
6: The US
Black/African American population carries a disproportionate burden of
gonorrhoeal cases in 2022.
Figure
7: The US
Black/African American population carries a disproportionate burden of
chlamydia cases in 2022.
Figure
8: Independent of
ethnicity, young females carry a disproportionately high burden of gonorrhoeal
cases in 2022.
Figure
9: Independent of
ethnicity, young males carry a disproportionately low burden of chlamydia cases
in 2022.
References
Adimora,
A. A. and V. J Schoenbach (2005), ‘Social context, sexual networks, and racial
disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections’, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 191 (s1), S115–S122, available at https://doi.org/10.1086/425280, accessed 27 May 2024.
Armenta,
R. F., D. Kellogg, J. L. Montoya, R. Romero, S. Armao, D. Calac and T. L Gaines
(2021), ‘There is a lot of practice in not thinking about that’: Structural,
interpersonal, and individual level barriers to HIV/STI prevention among
reservation based American Indians, International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (7), 3566, available at https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073566, accessed 8 May 2024.
Auslander,
B. A., F. M. Biro, P.A. Succop, M.B. Short, and S.L. Rosenthal (2009),
‘Racial/ethnic differences in patterns of sexual behavior and STI risk among
sexually experienced adolescent girls’, Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 22 (1), 33–39, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2008.01.075, accessed 22 May 2024.
Bertolli,
J., L.M. Lee and P.S. Sullivan (2007), ‘Racial Misidentification of American
Indians/Alaska Natives in the HIV/AIDS Reporting Systems of Five States and One
Urban Health Jurisdiction, U.S., 1984–2002’, Public Health Reports,
122(3), pp.382–392, available at:
doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/003335490712200312, accessed 29 May 2024.
BMJ
(2019), The chi squared tests | the BMJ. [online] BMJ.com, available at: https://bmjchicken.bmj.com/thebmj/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/statistics-square-one/8-chisquared-tests, accessed 21
May 2024.
Boskey,
E. (2009), ‘Socioeconomic status (SES) and STD risk,’ Verywell Health Online, available at: https://www.verywellhealth.com/socioeconomic-status-ses-3132909, accessed 27
May 2024.
Boti
Sidamo, N., S. Hussen, T. Shibiru, M. Girma, M. Shegaze, A. Mersha, T. Fikadu,
Z. Gebru, E. Andarge, M. Glagn, S. Gebeyehu, B. Oumer and G. Temesgen (2021),
‘Exploring barriers to effective implementation of public health measures for
prevention and control of COVID-19 pandemic in Gamo zone of Southern Ethiopia:
Using a modified Tanahashi model’, Risk
Management and Healthcare Policy,
1219–32, available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33776499/, accessed 15 May 2024.
Brady,
S. S., J. M. Tschann, J. M. Ellen and E. Flores (2009), ‘Infidelity, trust, and
condom use among Latino youth in dating relationships’, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 36 (4), 227–31, available at https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0b013e3181901cba, accessed 28 May 2024.
Burton,
L. (2007), ‘Childhood adultification in economically disadvantaged families: A
conceptual model’, Family
Relations, 56 (4),
329–45 available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00463.x, accessed 28 May 2024.
CDC
(2021a), ‘STI treatment guidelines’, Online
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, available at: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/default.htm, accessed 7
May 2024.
CDC
(2021b), ‘Adolescents’, Online
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, available at https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/adolescents.htm, accessed 7
May 2024.
CDC
(2024a), ‘Sexually transmitted infections surveillance, 2022’, Online Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention,
available at https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/default.htm, accessed 7
May 2024.
CDC
(2024b), ‘National overview of STIs, 2022’, Online Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, available at https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/overview.htm, accessed 7
May 2024.
Crooks,
N., B. King and A. Tluczek (2019), ‘Protecting young black female sexuality’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22 (8), 1–16, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1632488, accessed 29 May 2024.
Davidoff-Gore,
A., N. Luke and S. Wawire (2011), ‘Dimensions of poverty and inconsistent
condom use among youth in urban Kenya’, AIDS Care,
23 (10), 1282–90, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2011.555744, accessed 23 May 2024.
Duffin,
E. (2022), ‘US population by gender 2027’, Online Statista, available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/737923/us-population-by-gender/#:~:text=Projection%20estimates%20calculated%20using%20the, accessed 4
June 2024.
Eder,
D. and A. Others, (1995), ‘School Talk: Gender and Adolescent Culture’, Rutgers
University Press, available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED388393, accessed 29 May 2024.
Epstein,
R., J. Blake and T. Gonzalez (2017), ‘Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of
Black girls childhood’, Online
SSRN Electronic Journal,
available at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3000695, accessed 29 May 2024.
Ford,
K. and J. M. Lepkowski (2004), ‘Characteristics of sexual partners and STD
infection among American adolescents’, International
Journal of STD & AIDS,
15 (4), 260–65, available at https://doi.org/10.1258/095646204773557802, accessed 22 May 2024.
Gentry,
M. (1998), ‘The sexual double standard’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22 (3), 505–11, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00173.x, accessed 28
May 2024.
Goldman,
E. (1998), ‘Free love, American experience’, Online PBS,
available at https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/goldman-free-love/, accessed 15
May 2024.
Hook,
E. W. and R. D. Kirkcaldy (2018), ‘A brief history of evolving diagnostics and
therapy for gonorrhea: Lessons learned’, Clinical Infectious Diseases, 67 (8), 1294–99, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy271, accessed 15 May 2024.
Hooper,
R. R., G. H. Reynolds, O. G. Jones, A. A. Zaidi, P. J. Wiesner, K. P. Latimer,
A. Lester, A. F. Campbell, W. O. Harrison, W. W. Karney, K. K. and Holmes
(1978), ‘Cohort study of venereal disease. I: The risk of gonorrhea
transmission from infected women to men’, American Journal of Epidemiology, 108 (2), 136–44, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112597, accessed 27
May 2024.
Hwang,
L. Y., M. W. Ross, C. Zack, L. Bull, K. Rickman and M. Holleman (2000),
‘Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and associated risk factors
among populations of drug abusers’, Online
Clinical Infectious Diseases,
31 (4), 920–26, available at https://doi.org/10.1086/318131, accessed 28 May 2024.
James-Holmquest,
A. N., J. Swanson, T. M. Buchanan, R. D. Wende and R. P. Williams (1974),
‘Differential attachment by piliated and nonpiliated neisseria gonorrhoeae[11] to
human sperm’, Online Infection and Immunity, 9 (5), 897–902, available
at https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.9.5.897-902.1974, accessed 27 May 2024.
Jennings,
L. K. and D. M. Krywko (2023), ‘Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)’, Online National Library of Medicine, available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499959/, accessed 17 May 2024.
Johnson
Lewis, J. (2019), “Free love and women’s history in the 19th century (and later).”
ThoughtCo, available at www.thoughtco.com/free-love-and-womens-history-3530392, accessed 14
May 2024.
Kershaw,
H. (2018), ‘Remembering the ‘Don’t Die of Ignorance’ campaign’, Online Placing the Public in Public
Health: Public Health in Britain,
1948–2010, available at https://placingthepublic.lshtm.ac.uk/2018/05/20/remembering-the-dont-die-of-ignorance-campaign/, accessed 15
May 2024.
Ketterer,
M. R., P. A. Rice, S. Gulati, S. Kiel, L. Byerly, J. D. Fortenberry, D. E.
Soper and M. A. Apicella (2016), ‘Desialylation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Lipooligosaccharide by Cervicovaginal Microbiome Sialidases: The potential for
enhancing infectivity in men’, Online
Journal of Infectious Diseases,
214 (11), 1621–28, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw329, accessed 27 May 2024.
Kirkcaldy,
R. D., E. Weston, A. C. Segurado and G. Hughes (2019), ‘Epidemiology of
gonorrhoea: A global perspective’, Sexual
Health, 16 (5),
401, available at https://doi.org/10.1071/sh19061, accessed 15 May 2024.
Kleppa,
E., S. D. Holmen, K. Lillebø, E. F. Kjetland, S. G. Gundersen, M. Taylor, P.
Moodley and M. Onsrud (2014), ‘Cervical ectopy: Associations with sexually
transmitted infections and HIV. A cross-sectional study of high school students
in rural South Africa’, Sexually
Transmitted Infections,
91 (2), 124–29, available at https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2014-051674, accessed 22 May 2024.
Knight,
R., T. Falasinnu, J. L. Oliffe, M. Gilbert, W. Small, S. Goldenberg and J.
Shoveller (2016), ‘Integrating gender and sex to unpack trends in sexually
transmitted infection surveillance data in British Columbia, Canada: An ethno-epidemiological
study’, BMJ Open, 6 (8), e011209, available at https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011209, accessed 22 May 2024.
The
Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, (2022), ‘Youth STIs: An epidemic fuelled
by shame’, The
Lancet Child & Adolescent Health,
6 (6), 353, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00128-6, accessed 11 January 2025.
Lee,
V., J. M. Tobin and E. Foley (2006), ‘Relationship of cervical ectopy to
chlamydia infection in young women’, Journal
of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 32 (2), 104–06, available at https://doi.org/10.1783/147118906776276440, accessed 22 May 2024.
Manhica,
H., V. S. Straatmann, A. Lundin, E. Agardh and A. Danielsson (2020),
‘Association between poverty exposure during childhood and adolescence, and
drug use disorders and drug‐related crimes later in life’, Online Addiction, 116 (7), available at https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15336, accessed 28 May 2024.
Maraynes,
M. E., J. H. Chao, K. Agoritsas, R. Sinert and S. Zehtabchi (2017), ‘Screening
for asymptomatic chlamydia and gonorrhea in adolescent males in an urban
pediatric emergency department’, World
Journal of Clinical Pediatrics,
6 (3), 154, available at https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v6.i3.154, accessed 22 May 2024.
Marks,
M. J. and R. C. Fraley (2005), ‘The sexual double standard: fact or fiction?
Sex roles’, 52 (3-4), 175–86, available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5, accessed 29 May 2024.
Medical
Institute for Sexual Health (2024), ‘Racial/ethnic disparities and STIs’,
available at https://www.medinstitute.org/racial-ethnic-disparities-and-stis/, accessed 28
May 2024.
Meston,
C.M., P.D. Trapnell and B.B. Gorzalka (1996), ‘Ethnic and gender differences in
sexuality: Variations in sexual behavior between Asian and non-Asian university
students’, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25(1), pp.33–72. 995, available
at https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4426857/, accessed 28 May 2024.
Milhausen,
R. R. and E. S. Herold (1999), ‘Does the sexual double standard still exist?
Perceptions of university women’, Journal
of Sex Research, 36
(4), 361–68, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909552008, accessed 29 May 2024.
Nelson,
T., J. Nandwani and D. Johnson (2021), ‘Gonorrhea and chlamydia cases are
rising in the U.S. Sexually transmitted diseases’, available at https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0000000000001479, accessed 8 May 2024.
NHS
(National Health Service) (2017), ‘Chlamydia’, available at https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/chlamydia/#:~:text=sharing%20sex%20toys%20that%20are, accessed 8
May 2024.
NHS
(2019), ‘Overview – gonorrhoea’, available at: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gonorrhoea/, accessed 8 May 2024.
Okazaki,
S. (2002), ‘Influences of culture on Asian Americans’ sexuality’, Journal of Sex Research, 39 (1), 34–41, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552117, accessed 24 May 2024.
Oliver,
M. B. and C. Sedikides (1992), ‘Effects of sexual permissiveness on
desirability of partner as a function of low and high commitment to
relationship’, Social
Psychology Quarterly,
55 (3), 321, available at https://doi.org/10.2307/2786800, accessed 29 May 2024.
Platt,
R., P. A. Rice and W. M. McCormack (1983),’ Risk of acquiring gonorrhea and
prevalence of abnormal adnexal findings among women recently exposed to
gonorrhea’, Online
JAMA, 250 (23),
3205–09, available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6417362, accessed 7 June 2024.
Public
Health England (2021), ‘Promoting the sexual health and wellbeing of people
from a Black Caribbean background: An evidence-based resource’, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/promoting-the-sexual-health-and-wellbeing-of-people-from-a-black-caribbeanbackground-an-evidence-based-resource, accessed 30
May 2024.
Quillin,
S. J. and H. S. Seifert (2018), ‘Neisseria gonorrhoeae host adaptation and
pathogenesis’, Nature
Reviews Microbiology,
16 (4), 226–40, available at https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.169, accessed 9 May 2024.
Salazar,
L. F., R. A. Crosby, R. J. DiClemente, G. M. Wingood, E. Rose, J.
McDermott-Sales and A. M. Caliendo (2008), ‘African-American female adolescents
who engage in oral, vaginal and anal sex: ‘Doing it all’ as a significant
marker for risk of sexually transmitted infection’. AIDS and Behavior,
13 (1), 85–93, available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9381-5, accessed 24 May 2024.
Sentís,
A., A. Prats-Uribe, E. López-Corbeto, M. Montoro-Fernandez, D. K. Nomah, P. G.
de Olalla, L. Mercuriali, N. Borrell, V. Guadalupe-Fernández, J. Reyes-Urueña,
J. Casabona and Catalan HIV and STI Surveillance Group (2021), ‘The impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on sexually transmitted infections surveillance data: Incidence
drop or artefact?’, BMC
Public Health, 21 (1),
available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11630-x, accessed 3 June 2024.
Shannon,
C. L. and J. D. Klausner (2019), ‘The growing epidemic of sexually transmitted
infections in adolescents’, Online
Current Opinion in Pediatrics,
30 (1), 137–43, available at https://doi.org/10.1097/mop.0000000000000578, accessed 7 May.
Shrider,
E. (2023), ‘Poverty rate for the Black population fell below pre-pandemic
levels’, available at https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/09/black-poverty-rate.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20Black%20individuals%20made, accessed 28
May 2024.
Sprecher,
S., K. McKinney and T. L. Orbuch (1987), ‘Has the double standard disappeared?:
An experimental test’, Social
Psychology Quarterly,
50 (1), 24, available at https://doi.org/10.2307/2786887, accessed 29 May 2024.
Stamm,
W. E., M. E. Guinan, C. C. Johnson, T. Starcher, K. K. Holmes and W. M.
McCormack (1984), ‘Effect of treatment regimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae on
simultaneous infection with Chlamydia trachomatis’, The New England Journal of Medicine, 310 (9), 545–49, available at https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198403013100901, accessed 10 May 2024.
Sutton,
M. Y., N. F. Anachebe, R. Lee and H. Skanes (2021), ‘Racial and ethnic
disparities in reproductive health services and outcomes 2020’, Online Obstetrics & Gynecology, 137 (2), 225–33, available at https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004224, accessed 29 May 2024.
Tschann,
J. M., N. E. Adler, S. G. Millstein, J. E. Gurvey and J. M. Ellen (2002),
‘Relative power between sexual partners and condom use among adolescents’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 31 (1), 17–25, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00418-9, accessed 22 May 2024.
Tzilos
Wernette, G., K. Countryman, K. Khatibi, E. Riley and R. Stephenson (2020),
‘Love my body: Pilot study to understand reproductive health vulnerabilities in
adolescent girls’, Journal
of Medical Internet Research,
22 (3), 16336, available at https://doi.org/10.2196/16336, accessed 22 May 2024.
United
States Census Bureau (2021), ‘U.S. Census Bureau quickfacts: United States’, Online United States Census Bureau, available at https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221, accessed 21
May 2024.
Van
Gerwen, O. T., C. A. Muzny and J. M. Marrazzo (2022), ‘Sexually transmitted
infections and female reproductive health’, Online
Nature Microbiology, 7 (8), 1116–26, available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01177-x, accessed 17 May 2024.
Wong,
T., A. Singh, J. Mann, L. Hansen and S. McMahon (2004), ‘Gender differences in
bacterial STIs in Canada’, Online BMC Women’s Health, 4 (S1), 26, available at https://doi.org/10.1186/14726874-4-S1-S26, accessed 17 May 2024.
Zenilman,
J. M. (2001), ‘Ethnicity and STIs: More than black and white’, Sexually
Transmitted Infections, 77 (1), 2–3, available at https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.1.2, accessed 28 May 2024.
Glossary of terms
Asymptomatic[1]
Absence or perceived absence of
symptoms.
Chlamydia[2]
A sexually transmitted infection
caused by the bacterium Chlamydiae
trachomatis.
Chlamydiae trachomatis[3]
A bacterium that causes chlamydia.
Dysuria[4]
Pain during urination.
Ectopic pregnancies[5]
When a fertilised egg implants
itself outside of the womb.
Epidemiology[6]
The study of the causes,
distribution and control of disease in a population.
Epididymitis[7]
Inflammation of the epididymis,
located at the back of the testicle.
Gonorrhoea[8]
A sexually transmitted infection
caused by the bacterium Neisseria
gonorrhoeae.
HIV[9]
A sexually transmitted infection
caused by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
Monogamous[10]
Referring to having one sexual
partner at a time.
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
[11]
A bacterium that causes gonorrhoea.
Oral sex
[12]
Using a mouth to stimulate another
person’s genitals or anus.
Pandemic
[13]
An infectious disease prevalent
over several countries or continents.
Polygamous
[14]
Referring to having more than one
sexual partner at one time.
Proctocolitis
[15]
Inflammation of the rectum.
Purulent discharge
[16]
A pus-containing fluid.
Screening
[17]
STI screening can detect for the
presence of a sexually transmitted infection.
Sexual encounter
[18]
A single instance of sexual
activity, physical intimacy can vary.
Sexual network
[19]
A network of people that are linked
through sexual relationships.
Sexual orientation
[20]
A personal pattern of romantic or
sexual attraction.
Stigma
[21]
A negative social attitude toward a
person or circumstance, can include shame.
Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI)
[22]
A disease that can be transmitted
through sexual contact.
Surveillance
[23]
Collecting information about the
cases of STIs in a population.
Symptom
[24]
A feature (physical or mental) that
indicates a disease.
Symptomatic
[25]
Presence of symptoms.
Transmission
[26]
The spread of something from one
person to another.
Urethritis
[27]
Inflammation of the urethra.
To cite this paper please use the
following details: Parnell, A. (2025), ‘Age and Racial Disparities Persist for
Gonorrhoea and Chlamydia in the United States', Reinvention: an International
Journal of Undergraduate Research, Volume 18, Issue 1, https://reinventionjournal.org/index.php/reinvention/article/view/1597. Date accessed [insert date]. If
you cite this article or use it in any teaching or other related activities
please let us know by e-mailing us at Reinventionjournal@warwick.ac.uk.